Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?

Now it was up to her to perform well in the debate.

Post Credits:

Meta-Learning = Learning about Learning

Islam is definitely a very anti-LGBTQ religion, so why don't liberals ever stage pro-LGBTQ demonstrations at mosques or at the consulates/embassies of Muslim countries?

Well… No.

Jarvis (Just A Rather Very Intelligent System) is an artificial intelligence that assists Tony Stark (Iron Man) with a wide range of tasks, from managing his suits to offering tactical advice. Jarvis represents advanced technology, providing efficient, data-driven assistance without emotional nuance.

Alfred is Batman's butler, mentor, and moral compass. He provides emotional support, wisdom, and logistical help, acting as a human companion who ensures Bruce Wayne remains grounded. The relationship is deeply personal and rooted in trust and loyalty.

How do you get people to follow your Quora Space?

I would never use AI to write a Quora answer. I’ve got a different kind of attachment with Quora. Quora was the first platform I started creating content on. I’ve got a special corner for the people on Quora who have been reading my answers.

The thing is, ChatGPT existed in history—but in human form. People were creative back then because of a moderator in human form. Today, we don’t need a human moderator. Creativity will be maintained in the same way.

Bruce Wayne (Batman) has a human moderator: Alfred.

Why is Trump not on a violation of probation, offering a job for an endorsement is in violation of federal law? Kaamala knew better she is very sharp.

Meta-X = X about X

I totally disappeared from the face of Quora more than a year ago. And I reappear abruptly, out of thin air, talking about AI. Uncanny, isn’t it?

This is what she replied with:

Isn't it great that we have an incoming president who is embracing ideas from the past like manifest destiny? Isn't it greater that Trump is willing to get us more territory and land?

Amanuenses: Many famous writers employed assistants responsible for taking dictation or copying manuscripts. For example, John Milton, who was blind, dictated his epic poem Paradise Lost to amanuenses, including his daughters.

Just like Alexander the Great being tutored by Aristotle.

There’s an effective way to trap the opponents—by using our attacking argument as the defending argument—the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools. Using the same attacking and defending argument will trap the opponents by rendering them off of any additional points to counter.

Rick Carlisle Had Straightforward Explanation for Pacers' Late Struggles in Game 4 - Sports Illustrated

The other half? — It’s to counter the chess move put forward by the opponents.

In ancient kingdoms, viziers were senior advisors to the king or emperor. They handled state affairs, offered counsel, and executed the ruler’s directives, much like a modern-day chief of staff.

Another great historical reference would be that of Viziers.

Swimmer's itch: What it is and how to treat it - kare11.com

Now, concluding my answer to your question:

A vizier obviously has more knowledge than the king. But it doesn’t make him more capable than the king. The vizier helps, but the king makes the call. Just like AI is more potent than a human, but it doesn’t make it the main element.

That’s it. There isn’t much of a significant difference. Both superheroes work at the same creative level.

The Day the Earth Smiled: Earth, the Moon, and Saturn All in One Frame - The Daily Galaxy

Or was it?

A couple of months ago, I received these texts from one of my followers on Instagram:

I sent this PDF to my follower and asked her to use the same conclusion points to conclude her debate:

Redefining physics to roll a ball vertically - Phys.org

Or is it?

To achieve feats that are greater than us, we need a greater level of assistance.

What if all of this is being written by an AI?

NY retail worker safety law takes effect this week. Here’s what it does. - Gothamist

Is this AI as Sunny? Or Sunny as AI? Or just AI?

Generative AI is just autocorrect on steroids. To put it simply, its main job is to predict the next word. That’s it. Although it does that thing so brilliantly that it helps us create stuff, there’s no way it would make Quora or any other creative platform or job obsolete. It’ll just reduce the labor work that doesn’t require creativity. So, if your job is pure labor and doesn’t require you to be creative, AI will probably make it obsolete. It’s always better to switch to being creative. Not only would it be engaging and healthy for your brain, but you also wouldn’t feel threatened to lose your job.

The legendary works published by writers throughout history were crafted with the help of assistants. It’s just that AI solves the problem of hiring human assistants. Now we can have our own assistants for free (or for tiny subscription, coz… capitalism).

Does meth make women super horny like it does men?

Let’s make things even more meta.

Nah, I’m just kidding.

Alfred supports Batman on a personal and ethical level, whereas Jarvis is more of a technical and operational assistant for Iron Man.

I’m coming for you, humans.

Well, well, well.

Meta-Joke = A Joke about Jokes

ChatGPT will not make Quora (or any other platform) obsolete.

Hahaha.

Or am I?

A sort of Meta-AI thing.

Calm down. It’s Sunny this side.

Even if the greatest novel writers didn’t have ChatGPT back then, they did have somebody special around them who sparked ideas like a catalyst in a chemical reaction. But today, we don’t need to rely on another human for that. We can rely on Generative AI.

Tony Stark (Iron Man) has an AI moderator: Jarvis.

Viziers:

Examples:

So the crazy little idea was to make the debate Meta.

What if this answer itself was written by ChatGPT? What if I trained ChatGPT on all of my Quora answers and taught it my language, tone, and way of writing?

So this answer was not written using AI.

ChatGPT is like Dr. Watson to Sherlock Holmes. Alfred to Batman. There’s even a software called Alfred for Mac systems. I personally use it. There’s a reason why it was named Alfred. It proves that in this modern world, you don’t need to be a billionaire like Bruce Wayne to have your personal butler.

Well… now we’ve put forth our chess move. That’s half of what it takes to win a debate.

I can’t explain the joy that ran through my nerves seeing we were able to pull off such a heist.

So I replied to her texts with this:

As you will see, this crazy little idea would help her win this debate competition against 20 other teams (even though she had less than 12 hours to prepare) and will also answer your question. So stay with me.

Sunny Dhondkar

I collected every point I had discussed with her in Instagram DMs and fed those points to ChatGPT, asking it to lead them to a final conclusion. Furthermore, I asked it to create a PDF of the conclusion points and send it to me.

Before we proceed, you should be aware of the prefix Meta.

Meta-Discussion = Discussion about Discussion

So, basically, for her to win the debate competition, she would need to prove that AI (tools like ChatGPT) does not hinder the art of creative thinking in humans.

That’ll be done by bringing forth the historical term Amanuenses.

This analogy summarizes my point best:

It’s by showing the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools like ChatGPT. Tools like these cannot think for you. You have to do the thinking. Then communicate with these tools. Then the tools will behave like your assistants.

Although, this level of comparison isn’t totally valid right now because what we are dealing with currently is Generative Artificial Intelligence and not Artificial General Intelligence. There’s way more to go for us to reach that level.

That’s by using AI to win the debate defending AI.

Now, you’re about to experience a little heist we pulled.

I was already occupied with a lot of work, but I had this crazy little idea that made me throw away everything else and glue myself to this moment.

So, I asked her to roughly formulate what the potential moves of her opponents might be.

But how does this meta-fication prove our point?

The next day, I received her text:

Alright.